Video conferencing review • Editorial • Updated

Jitsi Review: The Open-Source Video Meeting Alternative

Jitsi is a free, open-source video conferencing platform designed for privacy-conscious users and teams. This review focuses on real usage: call reliability, self-hosting trade-offs, and when Jitsi makes sense compared to commercial tools.

Overall: 7.6/10 Best for: open-source & privacy-first meetings Not ideal for: large or business-critical meetings

Try Jitsi Jump to verdict

No affiliate links are active at this time. Rankings are editorial — no paid placements.

Table of Contents

Quick verdict (30-second summary)

Why people choose Jitsi

Open-source: transparent codebase and community-driven
No account required: instant meetings via link
Self-hosting option: full control over infrastructure and data

When it’s not the best choice

You host large or business-critical meetings
You need guaranteed performance and SLAs
You want polished enterprise features out of the box

Try Jitsi Compare all tools

How we scored Jitsi

Jitsi’s score reflects open-source and privacy-first usage, not enterprise expectations. We evaluated what actually matters for teams choosing a free or self-hosted solution.

Join simplicity: no account, instant links
Privacy & control: open-source transparency, self-hosting
Call reliability: performance on public vs self-hosted instances
Limitations: scalability and advanced meeting features

Scores are editorial, experience-based, and not influenced by vendors.

Pricing overview

Jitsi Meet (public): free to use
Self-hosted: free software, infrastructure costs apply
No paid plans: no official commercial tiers

Costs depend on hosting, bandwidth, and infrastructure choices.

Start a meeting See alternatives

Best for / Avoid

Best for

Privacy-focused individuals and teams
Open-source advocates and developers
Organizations wanting self-hosted video meetings

Avoid if

You need enterprise-grade reliability guarantees
You host large or high-stakes meetings

Common Jitsi use cases

Private or ad-hoc video calls
Open-source communities and NGOs
Self-hosted internal meetings

Pros & Cons

Pros

Free and open-source
No account required
Self-hosting available

Cons

Less reliable at scale
Limited advanced features
No official support or SLA

Key features that matter in practice

Open-source stack: full transparency
Web-based: runs directly in the browser
Self-hosting: full data control

Security & privacy (what matters)

Jitsi’s open-source nature allows full inspection of its code and infrastructure. Security depends heavily on how and where it is hosted. Self-hosted deployments offer maximum control but require technical expertise.

Jitsi alternatives

Zoom: better for reliability and scale Read Zoom review →
Google Meet: better for simplicity and browser-based meetings Read Google Meet review →
Microsoft Teams: better for structured team collaboration Read Teams review →
Webex: better for enterprise compliance Read Webex review →

Final verdict

If privacy, transparency, and control matter more than polish, Jitsi remains one of the best open-source video meeting tools in . For business-critical or large-scale meetings, commercial platforms are usually a safer bet.

Try Jitsi Compare all tools

Editorial disclosure: No paid placements. Opinions based on real-world usage.

↑ Back to top

This review is for informational purposes only. Features and availability may change. Always verify details on the project’s official website.